Page 37 - Tehelka-May18
P. 37

LegisLation





 Citizenship (Amendment)    succeeded in getting assurance from   that the motivated elements “clev-  ficed their lives. The forum also claimed

                                          erly avoided the fact that those asylum
         the AGP leaders that if the bill is amend-
                                                                          that the immigrants who entered In-
                                          seekers are not merely Bengali Hindus,
         ed they would quit Sarbanad Sonowal-
                                                                          dia between 1951 and 1971 (December
 Bill sparks uproar in Assam  led government in Dispur.   but also a mix of Rajbongshi, Hajong,   16) should be treated as East Pakistani
           However, the debate had a major
                                          Jayantiya, Bishnupriya, Chakma, Garo,
                                                                          nationals, as Bangladesh emerged as a
                                          Khasi, Adivasi, etc. people.” “Moreover,
         turn when a leader from Asom Sattra
                                                                          sovereign nation only after December
         Mahasabha, an organisation represent-  all these people are the victims of Pa-  16 (not March 25, 1971, as often reported
         ing the Vaishnavite monasteries of As-  kistan’s partition game plan and had   by media) following the surrender of
 To grant Citizenship Act in Assam by the BJP-led government    shelter in the country prior to Decem-  sam, placed a memorandum in front   to live in a foreign land for which they   Pakistani forces under the leadership
 in the State and Centre, in the name of religion, is seen as a    ber 31, 2014. The people of Assam has   of the Joint Parliamentary Committee   are not at all responsible,” the statement   of Amir Abdullah Khan Niazi, popu-
 witnessed rigorous protests by a num-
                                                                          larly called AAK Niazi to the Muktijod-
                                          asserted.
         (JPC), supporting the amendment in
 political ploy by the indigenous people of Assam who have    ber of influential bodies like All Assam   New Delhi very recently. At least, two   It also clarified that the initiative is   dhas (forces of Bangladesh freedom
 vehemently opposed the plan, seeking a rational solution to it,   Students’ Union, Asom Sahitya Sabha,   other organisations representing Ben-  meant to allow citizenship for those   struggle).
 Krishak Mukti Sangram Samity along   gali and Nepali communities of the   Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, Christian, Jain   However, father of Bangladesh
 writes nava thakuria  with a number of outfits representing   state also supported the Centre’s move.   and Parsi refugees, who were persecut-  Sheikh Mujibur Rahman declared
 the ethnic populace.   However, over 25 indigenous outfits ve-  ed because of their religious practices in   the independence of Bangladesh on
 Need not to mention that the ruling   hemently opposed the amendment.   Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan   March 25, 1971, but, the land was very
 Bhartiya Janata Party has supported the   The local media targeted Asom Sat-  and had already taken shelter in India   much under the Pakistani authority till
 move, whereas, Asom Gana Parishad,   tra Mahasabha and went on terming   prior to December, 31, 20 14, and there is   December 16 of the year, hence, it can-
 Congress, All India United Democratic   it as Jatidrohi (anti-Assamese). Both the   no provision to bring more Bangladeshi   not be termed as Bangladesh (so as the
 Front, CPI, CPM, etc. has continued op-  print and electronic media outlets in   residents as Bangladeshi nationals), the
 posing it. The primary reason to oppose   Assam were poured in with news and   statement added.
 the Centre’s move was that ‘in a federal   views against the organisations, fol-  The alternate   Finally, the PPFA statement even
 and democratic set-up’, New Delhi was   lowing which they retreated from their   argued that if the deportation of ille-
 forcing legislation against the interest   earlier stand, issued an apology to their   media — where   gitimate immigrants (Bangladeshi) be-
 of Assam and its people. The new pro-  millions of followers and also suspend-  unhealthy, biased   comes impossible or too difficult to deal
 visions are being understood as to turn   ed the leaders who went to attend the   with because of serious humanitarian
 the Assamese people into a minority in   JPC hearing in New Delhi.  and irresponsible   and international crisis, the Union Gov-
 their own state. Moreover, the develop-  However, a media statement from   outbursts rule —   ernment should think of offering work
 ment would affect the long accepted   a patriotic forum changed the atmos-  permits (without voting rights) for them
 and sustained secular principles ac-  phere astoundingly. Expressing con-  give space for the   to resolve the issue amicably.
 corded in the constitution of a republic   cern over “creating sentiments with   debates on the   Suddenly, the print media in Guwa-
 (India).  unhealthy debates” and “aggressive                             hati has lost interest in debating over
 “The Citizenship (Amendment) Bill,   attacks on the organisations,” the Patri-  Citizenship Act  the issue. The city-based satellite news
 2016, is clearly aimed at affecting the   otic People’s Front Assam (PPFA), which   channels too have completely ignored
 people of Assam rather selectively. It is,   supports the Centre’s amendment ini-  the PPFA statement, subsequently
 therefore, discriminatory in nature and   tiative, issued a statement emphasising   (or Pakistani and Afghan national) after   shutting the doors to talk about the is-
 deserves to be abandoned immediately   on rational debates over the pertinent   the said date.   sue logically. The alternate media gave
 if India claims to be a true democracy   issue, which was eventually pub-  Extending support to the amend-  space for the debates, where unhealthy,
 that respects the wishes, aspirations   lished by most of the Guwahati-based   ment, the PPFA, however, demanded   bias and irresponsible outbursts domi-
 photo: ujjal deb  and fears of the people instead of trying   morning dailies. The forum, compris-  that the asylum seekers from the neigh-  nate the space. By now, a number of
 to ram a perverse law down the throats   ing a group of nationalist individuals,   bouring countries must be distributed   organisations namely Hindu Jagaran
 ssam was waiting to boil   • Language row Those who prefer to stay    of millions,” read an editorial of a Guwa-  claimed in the statement that “a section   judiciously across India. Moreover,   Mancha, Hojai Nagarik Samaj, Akhil
 once the Centre gets suc-  legally in Assam have been advised to adopt   hati-based newspaper.   of Assamese intellectuals and civil soci-  those who prefer to stay legally in As-  Bhartiya Vidyarthi Parishad, etc. came
 ceeded in amending the   the Assamese language  Meanwhile, a forum opposing The   ety groups had tried their best to project   sam should adopt the Assamese lan-  out with official statements supporting
 Citizenship Act that pro-  Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2016, has   The Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2016,   guage. The PPFA, also, reiterated its old   the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill. They
 A vides legal rights to stay in   surfaced in the State and it has declared   in a bias perception as if the whole ini-  stand to detect all illegal immigrants   claimed that the initiative would affect
 India to religious minorities or refugees,   Bill, 2016, in the Parliament, but, sud-  protest programs against the Centre’s   tiative is Assam centric.” “Those biased   from the then East Pakistan (present   the Assamese community as a whole,
 except for Muslim, from the neighbour-  denly, the voice got dilute and the lo-  plan to grant citizenship to those seek-  individuals have made the hue and cry   Bangladesh) with the cut-off year of   but would help the nation to a greater
 ing countries. A number of indigenous   cal media of Guwahati soon started to    ing asylum in the State. The forum com-  that once it turns into a law, millions of   1951 as it is applicable to the entire na-  extent in the days to come.
 organisations, local politicians, intel-  ignore the razing issue.   prising a number of Assamese authors,   Bengali Hindu people from Bangladesh   tion. It argued that the spirit of Assam
 lectuals, media personalities, etc. from    The debate emerged as soon as the   journalists, academicians, political ob-  would be dumped into Assam and the   Movement (1979 to 1985) was to de-  The author is a Northeast India-based
 Assam have unanimously opposed   Union Government prepared to pave   servers, etc. recently joined in a sit-in   practice will continue for decades,” it   port all foreigners since 1951, in which   political commentator
 the recent initiative of the Centre to   ways for granting citizenship to those   demonstration in the city with sizable   added.  Khargeswar Talukder, the first martyr
 endorse the Citizenship (Amendment)   asylum seekers, who had already taken   participation. The forum, somehow,   The PPFA statement also claimed   of Assam and over 850 martyrs sacri-  letters@tehelka.com



 tehelka / 31 may 2018  36  www.tehelka.com  tehelka / 31 may 2018  37  www.tehelka.com



 36-37 Nava Thakuria.indd   2-3                                                                       17/05/18   6:05 PM
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42