| From
Tehelka Magazine, Vol 6, Issue 22, Dated Jun 06, 2009 |
|
| CURRENT
AFFAIRS |
|
in cold blood |
|
‘I Lost Because
Of Varun Gandhi’s
Speech’
 |
| PHOTO:SHAILENDRA PANDEY |
Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi, BJP General
Secretary, is not mincing words. He
tells NEHA DIXIT that the top leaders
should have disowned hate speech
The first thing you said post-elections was that the era
of Mandal and kamandal politics is over. Was the BJP
out of step?
Caste and communal politics has been vigorously pursued
in the country for the last two decades. It has reached a
saturation point and has also angered the voters a lot.
What is noteworthy is that all political parties that have
made caste and communal politics their base have suffered
great losses in the elections. Dalit votes shifted away from
Mayawati because of her caste politics. Voters started
marginalising Mulayam Singh Yadav because of his communal
politics. In Kerala and West Bengal, Communist
parties were also rejected for negative politics.
But the BJP has indulged in casteism all these years.
The BJP kept away from caste politics but it fell victim to the
environment. A casteist, communal and regional leadership
took over the natural leadership. Atal Behari Vajpayee
started an era of positive approach towards development in
1999. The new generation only accepts an approach like this.
Seventy percent of the voters in India were born 20 years
after independence. The conflict surrounding independence
and the communal riots during Partition are merely stories
for them. They do not associate with them.
| ‘A casteist, communal and
regional leadership took over the
natural leadership in BJP’ |
The BJP’s negative campaign did not work?
The BJP’s approach on the whole was completely positive and
correct. But the approach of some individuals led to a negative
impact. I don’t want to take names but because of them,
issues like internal security, price rise and economic disorder
got diluted. In turn, non-issues dominated the campaign.
You talked about issues in your constituency (Rampur)
but you still suffered a defeat.
I lost because of Varun Gandhi’s speech in Pilibhit. Not only
did it have a very big negative impact across the country but
we lost 24 seats in Uttar Pradesh alone including major ones
like Bareilly, Moradabad and Aonla. I had raised positive issues
in Rampur but I lost Muslim votes. When a party gets a
negative image like that because of one individual, it makes a
lot of difference. In a situation like this, the polarisation of
votes is obvious and can’t be stopped.
But the top leadership kept endorsing such speeches to
get votes, instead of raising development issues.
It’s true that speeches on communal hatred obscured valid
issues. Its not that hate speeches were not checked, it is
just that the top political leadership did not effectively disown
it. As a result, our message did not come across that
well. It should have been nipped in the bud.
Advani ran a Presidential style campaign. Do you think
he should take the moral responsibility for the debacle?
No. It is our collective responsibility.
Voices from within the party say that the defeat was a
result of the drawing room strategies of the campaign
managers.
We can’t blame them. They only implement the blueprint
of the campaign. The problem is when the focus shifts
away from the actual issues and non-issues take the lead.
With elements like these, don’t you think the party needs
an overhaul?
I don’t think the BJP needs an overhaul. There are a lot of
energetic young faces in the BJP. We have to move ahead.
The next target is the forthcoming assembly elections. |