| From
Tehelka Magazine, Vol 6, Issue 3, Dated Jan 24, 2009 |
|
| CURRENT
AFFAIRS |
|
journalism |
|
Messenger Shot,
Bajrang Style
The arrest of an editor in Karnataka highlights
the problems of the media, reports SANJANA
ON JANUARY 6, 2009 in a scene
straight out of a 1970s
Bollywood movie, six police
vans chased down the car in
which the chairman and director of
Chitra Publications, BV Seetaram, and
his wife were travelling in Udupi district,
Karnataka. Seetaram stepped out to face
a posse of 25 policemen seeking to arrest
him in a two-year-old defamation suit
against him. It is ironic that the policemen
had forgotten to bring along the
arrest warrant.
Chitra Publications publishes three
newspapers, including the controversial
Kannada news daily, Karavali Ale. A
popular read in the coastal districts of
Karnataka, the newspaper claims 40,000
subscribers and over two lakh readers.
 |
Shocking
treatment The police arrested Seetaram as they would a
hardened criminal |
A day after his arrest, Seetaram was
produced before the court of the Judicial
Magistrate (First Class) in Udupi —
handcuffed to an iron chain and escorted
by several policemen wielding
automatic rifles. Citing a serious threat
to his life from the police and the state
government, he refused to apply for bail
but changed his mind after being moved
to Mysore.
Seetaram’s arrest follows nearly two
months of sustained attacks against his
newspaper clearly aimed at disrupting Karavali Ale’s circulation. On November
17, the newspaper’s printing press in
Mangalore was attacked and a constable
on duty sustained injuries. Weeks later,
distribution vans were intercepted and
over 5,000 copies of the paper burnt.
Hawkers and shops selling or stocking it
were ransacked. Though complaints
were filed and cases registered, no
arrests have been forthcoming — something
that hardly surprises the editor.
Seetaram has consistently held
Bajrang Dal activists responsible for the
attacks — he says they are incensed by
his open criticism of their role in the
attacks on churches in and around Mangalore
in 2008. Seetaram’s accusation of
the Bajrang Dal has hardly been refuted.
The Bajrang Dal’s Dakshina Kannada
district convenor, Vinay Shetty, while talking to TEHELKA, indicated support for
the attacks against Karavali Ale. “If
people are angry, they will react. He
(Seetaram) attacks Hindu, Christian and
Muslim religious leaders; people from
the community will come forward to
defend their leaders.” Days after a series
of articles in his newspaper accusing the
Sangh Parivar of playing a fascist role in
the coastal region, Seetaram was arrested
in a defamation suit filed against him
in July 2007.
Bhoja Shetty, a resident of Udupi,
filed the defamation charge against
Seetaram alleging that the editor had
blackmailed Shetty for a sum of Rs 1
lakh. Shetty states that when he refused
to give in, the editor portrayed him as a
rapist in his newspaper even though the
charges were unsubstantiated.
IN YET another incident in 2007, cases
were filed against Seetaram after he
carried a series of provocative articles
against Jainism and the Jain community.
Seetaram had questioned the decision of
a popular Jain saint to participate in
public processions in the nude. He had
argued that religious sanction had to
make way for the demands of public
morality, especially since there was a law
against nudity in India. The language and
the tenor of the articles had led to his
arrest following cases filed from an irate
Jain community. “On several occasions,
we ourselves don’t agree with the way
our articles are presented. There is
unstated yet clear pressure to meet a
mark that has been set. Crime sells. Sensationalism
sells,” says a local Karavali
Ale reporter on condition of anonymity.
Questions about Seetaram’s brand of
journalism notwithstanding, the sequence
of events and his handcuffing
have sparked outrage amongst journalists
and editors across Karnataka and
elsewhere. Protests and statements of
condemnation against the highhandedness
of the police, the political manoeuvring
behind the timing of the arrest and
the attacks against Karavali Ale continue
to pour in.
The International Federation of Journalists,
the Editors’ Guild of India, the
Delhi Union of Journalists and several
journalists’ representation bodies within
Karnataka have called the incident a
clear threat to the democratic right to a
free press. The Editors’ Guild of India
has called for the repeal of criminal
defamation provisions in the Indian
Penal Code saying these provisions force
editors to make long journeys to courts
in small towns and have become
instruments of harassment misused by
influential persons.
The BJP Government and the police
have, however, denied the claim that
Seetaram has been targeted for his
anti-communal stance. In statements
issued soon as condemnations of the
arrest began pouring in, both the
Inspector General of Police (Western
Range) AM Prasad (Udupi and Mangalore
fall under his command) as well as
VS Acharya, the Home Minister, denied
unfair treatment. Delays in acting on
Seetaram’s complaints of attacks against
his publication are attributed baldly to
“time required to complete due
processes of investigation.”
These denials aside, there are other
instances which suggest that the BJP
Government and the police are unfairly
supporting proponents of the Hindutva
ideology. No action has been taken in
two separate complaints lodged in Mangalore
against a Kannada daily, Vijaya
Karnataka. The complaints were filed by
PB D’Sa, president of the Dakshina
Kannada Peoples’ Union for Civil Liberties
and James Louis of the Bharathiya
Crista Seva Sanghatane against a rightwing
Kannada author, SL Byrappa, Vijaya Karnataka columnist Pratap
Simha, and the editors and publishers of
Vijaya Karnataka. Both D’Sa and Louis
alleged that the articles were highly
provocative and defended the attacks on
the Christian community.
In the communalised atmosphere
that has descended on Mangalore and
the coastal districts, the fact that Seetaram
was arrested and sternly treated
while no action has been taken against
the right-wing press is significant. Media
responsibility and freedom of the press
appear to be separated in Karnataka.
WRITER’S EMAIL
sanjana@tehelka.com |