| From
Tehelka Magazine, Vol 6, Issue 14, Dated Apr 11, 2009 |
|
| CURRENT
AFFAIRS |
|
tehelka impact |
|
Finally, The First
Sign Of Justice
Tehelka’s investigation of the Gujarat carnage
played a large role in ensuring the arrest of a
high-profile minister. RANA AYYUB tracks the case
|
Duly charged Maya Kodnani is the
first Gujarat minister
to be arrested
Photo: TRUPTI |
AAJ SHAAYAD hum insaaf ki
umeed kar sakte hain” (Perhaps
today we can hope for
justice) mused Nanumiyan
Malek, one of the key witnesses
in the Naroda Patiya and Naroda
Gaon riot cases. Last week, the Gujarat
High Court rejected the anticipatory bail
applications of State Minister Maya Kodnani
and VHP leader Jaideep Patel. Malek’s
testimony in this regard was crucial.
| The Tehelka tapes
reveal how Kodnani
instigated the mob
to kill Muslims |
This was the first arrest of a state
minister for involvement in the post-
Godhra riots of 2002, one of the worst
communal riots in India’s history. The
Supreme Court appointed a Special Investigative
Team (SIT) in March 2008 to re-investigate nine of the worst post-
Godhra riots, including the Gulbarg Society
massacre which saw the killing of
ex-MP Ehsaan Jaafri along with 40 others,
as well as the infamous Naroda Patiya
massacre which claimed 106 lives. The
SIT approached the High Court to strike
down the anticipatory bail granted by
the Sessions Court to Kodnani and Patel.
Significantly, the SIT team asked for
the tapes of the landmark 2007 TEHELKA
investigation which exposed the involvement
of the state machinery. These
tapes also helped indict not just the two
figures named above but other leaders as
well as policemen for playing a role in
the riots. This TEHELKA exposé brought
to the fore not just Kodnani and Patel
but also State Home Minister Gordhan
Zadaphia and Chief Minister Narendra
Modi, among others. In one of the tapes
an accused had spoken at length of how
Maya Kodnani moved around all day in
an open jeep wearing a saffron headband,
raising slogans and instigating the
mob to kill Muslims.
THE MAYA KODNANI
CASE FILE
Charged under section 143 of the
Indian Penal Code
Charged with attempt to murder for
firing from her own revolver
40 witnesses testified. Telephone
records proved presence in riot area
Gujarat High Court has not given her
permission to approach Supreme Court |
Richard: Mayaben was moving around
all day in an open jeep…
TEHELKA: On the day of the Patiya massacre…
Richard: [She was saying] Jai Shri Ram,
Jai Shri Ram... wearing a saffron headband...
She kept raising slogans..She said,
carry on with your work, I’m here [to
protect you].
In another taped confession, Babu
Bajrangi who was arrested and later let
off had said that he was in constant
touch with Jaideep Patel and that he had
spoken to him at least eleven times to
update him about the carnage.
TEHELKA: You were in touch only with
Jaideepbhai?
Bajrangi: Only Jaideep was talking to
me from the VHP.
TEHELKA: The day Muslims were killed…
Bajrangi: I spoke to Jaideepbhai 11 or 12
times… aur humne tabiyat se kaata…
Haldighati bana di thi [we killed with
gusto, we turned the place into
Haldighati]… And I am proud of it, if I
get another chance, I will kill even more.
TEHELKA: Where was Jaideepbhai camping
then?
| SIT maintains the
Tehelka exposé helped
them question the
right people |
Bajrangi: Jaideepbhai was sitting at
Dhanwantri, which is Pravinbhai’s dispensary,
he was there... in Bapunagar…
There he was and I didn’t even tell him
that we were going to do this… In Naroda
and Naroda Patiya, we didn’t spare a single
Muslim shop, we set everything on
fire, we set them on fire and killed them...
|
Bloodbath At least 106
Muslims were killed in
Naroda Patiya. Kodnani
provoked the massacre
Photo: PARAS SHAH |
THE SIT had also earlier sought the
help of TEHELKA videos to seek the
remand of Valsad Deputy Superintendent
of Police KG Erda before the
Magisterial Court for allegedly giving a
free hand to rioters during the Gulbarg
Society massacre. The team later arrested
Erda and other VHP and local BJP leaders.
The SIT, which submitted its report to the
Supreme Court last month, was headed
by RK Raghavan and included members
such as CD Satpathy, former Director-
General of the UP police, and three IPS officers
from Gujarat, Sivanand Jha, Ashish
Bhatia and Geeta Johri. When asked, SIT
officials maintain that the videotaped confessions
by the accused in the TEHELKA exposé
helped them in questioning the right
people and using them as a reference
while going through the evidence. While
issuing its verdict in the Kodnani case, the
Gujarat High Court cited the order issued
by the Supreme Court when forming the
SIT, which observed, “Communal harmony
is the hallmark of democracy. If in
the name of religion people are killed, that
is absolutely a slur and blot on any society
governed by the rule of law. Religious fanatics
really do not belong to any religion.
They are no better than terrorists who kill
innocent people for no rhyme or reason.”
Strong evidence against Kodnani
came in the form of statements from almost
40 witnesses, including Nanumiya
Malek who filed an affidavit before the
apex court swearing that he had seen Maya Kodnani and Jaideep Patel leading
the mob and instigating the rioters. The
order also relied on Maya Kodnani’s
phone records, which indicated that
Kodnani was in the Naroda area for
around 40 minutes on the morning of
February 28, 2002, when riots were at
their peak. Nanumiya, a resident of Naroda,
was a BJP supporter before the riots.
Life changed when he saw Kodnani, who
he thought would save them, actually
going around with a revolver in her hands, firing it and asking her followers
to go after Muslims. Mukul Sinha, activist
and an applicant in the case for the victims,
hailed the judgement as a precedentsetting
one and said that the order proved
the riots were a pre-planned affair and not
a spontaneous reaction to the Godhra
killings. Sinha also felt that it was significant
that the court took cognisance of affidavits
which the defence had been
dismissing as contradictory.
Kodnani has never been in the good
books of Modi, which is perhaps why neither
the CM nor his ministers commented
on the judgement. When contacted for comment, Jai Narayan Vyas, spokesperson
for the state government stated, “Why
are you asking us to comment on the matter?
Would TEHELKA have been bothered
if the anticipatory bail in any other case
had been cancelled? The SIT team’s word
is not the word of law and by no means
has this caused any embarrassment to us,
as has been made out by everyone. It’s just
a matter of law.”
The judgement has raised the hopes
of thousands of riot victims who have
waited for justice for seven years. The
order has revived hope that the SIT will
be able to interrogate Kodnani and Patel
and reveal the link between the riots,
state ministers and organisations such as
the VHP.
WRITER’S EMAIL
rana@tehelka.com |