| From
Tehelka Magazine, Vol 5, Issue 37, Dated Sept 20, 2008 |
|
| |
‘SEZs will
have corporate totalitarianism’
“It’s my bedrock,” says Biju Mathew, 43, of the
New York Taxi Workers’ Alliance that he helped
co-found 12 years ago. An assistant professor of
Information Systems at the US’ Raider University,
Mathew is an iconic figure in the otherwise
doddering American labour movement. After
completing his PhD from Pittsburgh, Mathew
lived in an African-American working class
neighborhood “in the middle of absolute
poverty… to find a way to understand America”.
The Alliance has close to 12,000 members, many
of them immigrants from across the world.
Mathew is also active against right-wing Hindutva
forces in the US. During a visit to
Hyderabad, Mathew spoke to AJIT SAHI about the
taxi drivers’ campaigns, the threats from Hindutva
and the truth behind India’s SEZ projects.
Two years ago, the Standford University
called off your speech after a students’
newspaper accused you of being a jihadist.
What did you make of it?
There’s been a constant attack on me since I
began working on Hindutva-related issues in
the United States. Standford re-invited me
after they figured it was just a series of manufactured
things thrown at me. Various people
connected to Hindutva in the US have written
to my university seeking that I be fired, with
absurd claims that I misrepresent myself as a
professor when I’m an assistant professor.
When I first put out a report on the funding
the RSS receives in the US, it threatened a
defamation suit against me for Rs. 1 crore in
Gujarat. A Bajrang dal portal once had me on
their homepage with blood dripping off me.
After [Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra] Modi
was denied a visa to the US, I received a lot of
hate-mail. In a sense it’s an indication that the
work we’re doing is effective. The battle against
Hindutva is, of course, to be fought and won in India. But the Hindutva ideology
is reproduced in a more pure
form in the US than in India.
Subject to a particular kind of
racism, they feel the need to withdraw,
ghettoise, reconstruct and
identify themselves. In ideological
and financial support, Hindutva’s
growth in the US is a big issue.
What are the key features of
Hindutva in the US?
Hindutva outifts are masters in
creating different institutional
forms that settle into the crevices
of systems. In the last three years,
the Hindutva lobby has decided
to take on the US education system.
Under multicultural policies,
American children are exposed to
world history by the 6th grade.
There was a huge battle in California
last year when institutions like
Hindu Education Fund, Hindu
American Foundation and Vedic
Studies Foundation got into the
curriculum review process to
present mythology as history. It
took action from a range of academics
to bring that to a stop. The
next set of textbook reviews come up next year
in conservative states like Texas. Unlike in
India, three or four big US states decide the
curriculum for the entire country as other
states adopt their textbooks. We’ll have a big
battle on our hands.
Over the last two years, Hindutva organisations
have modelled themselves on the Zionist
lobby. The alliance between the Hindutva and
the Zionist lobbies is building up at several
levels. Hindutva has people working in Washington
on the Beltway to try and influence
policies. That infrastructure mirrors the Zionist
infrastructure. They are desperately trying
to penetrate universities like the Zionists’ did.
They are trying to set up chaired professorships
for which they are paying the money so
they have a say in who gets it. They were also
trying to go through [Sri Sri] Ravi Shankar.
There was an attempt to use Swraj Paul’s company,
Caparo, to set up chaired professorships.
How did they use Sri Sri Ravi Shankar?
Just walking down the beach in Nagapattinam
will tell you the story. Ravi Shankar, Mata
Amritanandamai and the VHP are deeply
implicated with each other in rehabilitation
efforts there. Ravi Shankar came to the Pioneer
Valley where there are five colleges of repute:
the University of Massachusetts, Smith
College, Holyoke College, Hampshire College
and Amherst College. Four of them are really
top-rank liberal arts institutions. One is a toprank
public institution. He [Ravi Shankar] was
setting up a meeting with the presidents of
those universities to start a centre. But a group
of people from University of Massachusetts
started a campaign and put and end to that.
One of the campaigners was harassed by calls
at her home from obviously VHP folks.
One of the big VHP projects is to bring all
temples together. In India that’s an impossible
project because there are all sorts of temples and
if someone comes and tells them to join a
particular temple they will just slap him and
send him home. In the US that effort has been
on for two years. The third US National Temple
Conference has just been held. I’ve been following
one of their activists for the last
12 years who is specially deputed
for this task. I wouldn’t be surprised
if there will be such consolidation.
Who makes up the Hindutva
lobby? What motivates them?
If I stand on the corner of Jackson’s
Heights in New York, probably the
largest Indian market in the US,
and ask the first 10 Indians who
pass by, maybe six or seven would
be pretty sympathetic towards and
support Hindutva. The post-1960s
wave of migration from India to
the US was in large part upper and
middle-class, urban professionals.
They are the base of the Hindutva
movement. Doctors, engineers,
professors are so positioned by the
American economy that their
work disperses them. From the
1960s to the 1980s you tend to see
the consolidation of Hindus in the
US. In the 1980s the trading
classes started migrating. At this
time, Hindutva also began to grow.
That group started to set up
institutions and the older professionals
started plugging into them.
A significant number are ideologues with
institutional connections in India.
But I must say it gets a very interesting set
of inflections in the US. Even a suburban
Hindu family that is not seriously into
Hindutva finds the bal vihars the only way out.
There’s a Hindu Students’ Council (HSC) which
runs cabs. I know reasonable middle-of-theroad
Hindu families that send their children to
an HSC camp. Not because they are dramatically
Hindutva but because they are in a
moment of crisis, they have no way to control
their culture, and they feel their own identity is
getting frail at the edges, especially the second
generation. At that moment they go to the
packaged form. As Romila Thapar says, this is
syndicated Hinduism.
What about the liberal Hindus in the US?
Over the last 10-15 years we’ve put in place
various institutions to do some of these battles.
It’s very difficult to make the battle against
Hindutva in the US an offensive battle because,
whether you call me progressive, liberal or leftist,
the number of struggles that I see in New York
— the anti-war movement, the taxi drivers —
that I need to be part of, are large. Hindutva does
not appear on my radar because the Indians are not necessarily my entire community.
[But] for every liberal who
vacates the space in the community
in the interest of hip-hop, for the
pleasures of the markets, it is
precisely the space the right-winger
gets into. Around 11 years ago we
started training South Asian kids to
be youth community activists.
We’ve trained more than 350 of
them. We put together a coalition
against genocide, of around 42
organisations, including leftist and
Marxist groups, the Indian Muslim
Council, the Vaishnav Centre.
You’ve been visiting India’s SEZs.
What is your assessment?
The SEZs are a huge landgrab. They
are a potential flashpoint. I’ve been
putting together a group in the US
and this was part of my task to visit
the various SEZs. I’ve been to SEZs in
Maharashtra and spent time in
Raigarh, the two power plants, the
port development. I’ve been to SEZ
in Andhra Pradesh and in Orissa.
For the Indian industrialists — the
Reliances, the Tatas, the Jindals —
rural India matters only as a point
of resource extraction. They couldn’t care less
about that place. India is being recrafted as 20-25
“hubs” as SEZs, all within a 40-50 km from the big
metros or on the coast near the ports. To see
them as Bihar, Jharkand, Orissa, Chhattisgarh is
wrong: it’s one mine, one stretch.
In India, you have gunda or rogue capitalism,
which allows the Kalinga Nagar atrocities
[where police fired and killed tribals protesting
an SEZ]. It would have been very difficult to
do a Kalinga Nagar in America. I don’t think it
will go on uninterrupted because the protests
are mounting. But if it goes on uninterrupted
you’ll have a dual India: a formal parliamentary
democracy as a certain kind of sham, a nation
state in which the nation has vanished and
only the state remains. And you will have
corporate totalitarianism in these hubs.
In India, if you object to an SEZ, you are seen
as opposed to development and prosperity.
Reliance SEZ has taken over 45 villages. But the
claim is that the villages don’t need rehabilitation
as they’re not being touched. This is a
multipurpose SEZ. We don’t know what it is
going to do. The SEZ Act allows 70 percent of
the land to be used for other purposes. This is
real estate speculation. There are supposedly
two power plants coming up: Tatas’ and
Reliance’s. Everyone there asked me, where
will the coal come from? There is none close
by. Everybody is convinced there won’t be any
power plant. They’ll start the project, it’ll fail,
and they’ll have the land.
The Georgia Tech University has been
granted 250 acres of land in Andhra Pradesh at
Rs 1.5 lakh an acre while the market rate is Rs
1.5 crore an acre. It will only grant MSc and PhD
degrees. An engineer with Oracle filed an RTI
and pulled out the papers. A 7-star hotel has
been planned there. Why should a university get
land at Rs 1.5 lakh an acre to build a 7-star hotel?
It’s grabbing the commons. What belongs to
everybody is being appropriated and privatised.
Has unionisation helped the NY cabbies?
After the September 11, 2001 attacks, 30 percent
of Manhattan was closed for months. Miles
around WTC were dead. Broadway, airports
were closed. Drivers lost a third of
their business. The New York City
administration said drivers are not
eligible for emergency relief but
airlines were. Our huge campaign
for eight months forced the Federal
Emergence Management Assistance
to re-open for drivers. Probably
8,000 drivers got out of debt.
Then we mounted a wage increase
campaign. In Hollywood
films you see a four-character
string on top of the yellow cab.
That’s a medallion number. It’s a
permit issued at $5 non-transferrable
in 1937. By 1950, brokers
had started to manipulate it and
turned it into a commodity. Its
market value now is $450,000. No
driver can buy it, of course, so he
leases cars from those who hold
these medallions. To run one 12-
hour shift from 5pm-5am, a driver
puts around $130 on the table and
$40 for gas. This is a profession
where you can go home with a
negative amount after work.
Every time there is a fare increase
the owners increase the
lease. In 1996, the drivers got 14 percent and
the owners 86 percent. In 2004, we ran a
campaign for a fare increase and a holding
down of the lease. Drivers got a 26 percent fare
increase and leases got eight percent. That was
the biggest wage increase in 35 years. Our
third campaign was launched when gas prices
were shooting up. We won it as waiting time.
Because we’ve won three battles, we’re facing a
backlash. One of the things the owners lost
when they went into leasing was control over
how much the drivers were making. Now they
are forcing GPS trackers into the taxis. It’s a
battle from hell. We’ve gone to court and the
legislature. We went on a near-total strike for
three days in September 2007, but the government
refused to back off.
A section of India is striving hard to
become America. Will it work?
Not a single American student of mine can think
like a citizen. Everything they do or evaluate —
life choices, how to live in a community — is like
a market decision: buy one, get one free. If hyper
consumption catches up in India, only 30 percent
will have access to it. These worlds are going
to split culturally so completely that the only
answer will be fascism. |