| From
Tehelka Magazine, Vol 5, Issue 34, Dated Aug 30, 2008 |
|
| |
Nine Ways
Of Looking At A Crisis
Violence embraced
Kashmir in the 1990s and in 2008 it has enveloped Jammu in its fold. HARINDER
BAWEJA captures the conflicting voices from a state that
is on a dangerous precipice. Photographs by UZMA MOHSIN
the reporter
I FLEW INTO the Valley
twice this year. On May 28, and again on August 14. In May, it appeared
very much the ‘paradise on earth’. Jannat was awash with sunlight, the
streets full of relaxed faces and the placid waters of the Dal Lake dotted
with houseboats and shikaras full of tourists. The boulevard along the
lake was teeming with holiday makers, mostly from Gujarat and Maharashtra,
and you had to remind yourself that the hundreds strolling around in saris
and bindis — symbols that left the Valley when the Pandits were forced
out in the early 1990s — were actually in Kashmir.
Less than three months later, not a single
taxi was available at Srinagar airport. The
tourism counter next to the baggage area was
desolate when, by the state’s own account, four
lakh tourists came here in the first six months
of the year. The city had clamped down its
shutters and the road leading into town was
charred black. Tyres were aflame at every
crossing and angry protestors raised slogans
for azadi at every turn. I had covered the Kashmir
insurgency since 1989, when the gun first
took root in the Valley, and was not in the least
surprised when irate Kashmiris pounded our
car, calling me and my photographer colleague
Uzma Mohsin “Hindus from India”.
The contrast between May and August is
stark and New Delhi is gob-smacked. The
mandarins in both North and South Blocks
can’t seem to figure out why the crowds are
swelling in Jammu, why its women are courting
arrest, why the Kashmiris are demanding
azadi once again. Why has a mere 40 hectares
of land — transferred to the Amarnath Shrine Board and then taken back — brought fire to
regions on either side of the Pir Panjal range?
Why has the state slipped into anarchy? Why
do Jammuites hate Kashmiris and vice versa?
 |
The
borders within need to be made irrelevant
|
The 40 hectares, 800
kanals, of land on the treacherous track to the 13,000ft-high Amarnath
Cave has been aptly described by a senior officer as “a wasteland”. It
would most certainly not have become Amarnath Nagar, nor seen the demographic
change some separatists have suggested. For most of the year, the area
is under 10 feet of snow, coming alive for just two summer months when
temporary huts and toilets are erected here for the use of pilgrims. In
all the sloganeering and hate that have consumed both Jammu and Kashmir
(J&K), neither the state’s mainstream parties nor the Centre have bothered
to clarify that the yatris have been provided these very facilities on
these same 40 hectares not only for the past six years but during this
one too, at the precise time that the crowds were thronging the streets,
armed not with weapons but communal vitriol. The Cabinet order transferring
the land would only have formalised the alreadyexisting arrangement.
Should Union Home Minister Shivraj Patil
not have gone to ground zero, accompanied by
the state’s politicians and the media, and cut
through the propaganda that now has J&K on a
precipice? The question of how well the minister
is informed of ground realities is important
because, even though state inputs put the
number of the Muzaffarabad Chalo march at
nothing less than 70,000, a smug Patil told a senior
politician at the all-party meeting in Jammu
that the crowd comprised only 8,000 people.
It is here that the crux of the problem lies.
In New Delhi’s procrastination, in its reluctance
to read the signals on the ground, in its
unwillingness to exhibit a statesman-like leap
of faith. At the heart of the crisis lies Delhi’s
penchant for treating it as no more than a law
and order problem.
SO, WHEN tourists thronged Srinagar’s
streets and North Block looked at the
figures — a drop in violence, infiltration
down to a trickle, the decimation of the Hizbul
Mujahideen, an increase in political activity,
Kashmiris agitating about civic issues like water
and power — it made a critical error. It mistook
surface calm for normalcy. It placed J&K at par
with Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, or any
other state. When the state Cabinet passed the
land transfer order, it took the Valley for
granted, and when in, a knee-jerk reaction, it
revoked the order, it took Jammu for granted.
If both Jammu and Kashmir appear at war
with each other, it is because they have only
been made hollow promises. Successive state
governments promised to personally escort the
Pandits back to the Valley. Former Prime Minister
Narasimha Rao promised autonomy. “The
sky is the limit,” he famously said. “Anything
short of azadi,” is how former Prime Minister
Deve Gowda worded it. More recently, Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh held out the hope
of building a “naya Jammu, Kashmir and
Ladakh”. Make the borders irrelevant, he said
over a year ago. Today, now that the fires are
raging, New Delhi doesn’t know what’s hit it.
And this time it can’t even blame the ISI.
Walk the streets of Srinagar and you will see
that the crowd marching with Pakistani flags in
their hands comprises a new generation. These
boys, most of whom grew up in violence, death
and destruction, appear fearless. In 1990,
militants openly displayed arms; today,
students are walking up to the security bunkers,
stones in hand, taunting the men in uniform,
saying, “Kill us, we want to become martyrs.”
Bravado? Maybe, but factor this in — if in the
early 1990s there was romanticism about a
movement that was just beginning; today, the
protestors are only too aware of the might of
the state. They did not know what counterinsurgency
measures entailed then, today’s
generation has grown up with them.
Ask a senior security officer, an Inspector
General of Police who was a Superintendent of
Police in 1992 and he will tell you that the
frenzy of a crowd of 10,000 equals the might
of 40,000. Speak to a Secretary-level IAS officer
in Jammu and he will tell you that Jammu has
good reason to feel neglected and discriminated
against. Spend time at the homes of
Pandits who did not migrate in the 1990s and
in hushed whispers they will tell you they are
now frightened enough to contemplate what
they resisted 20 years ago. Speak to migrants
in Jammu — they still live in tents and oneroom
tenements — and they say, enough is
enough; it’s payback time. Hindus in the Valley
are housed next to bunkers and Muslims in
Jammu have been swathed in a security blanket.
Then, Kashmiri women used to ensure
their men left home with their addresses in
their pockets. In 2008, the women are part of
the juloos winding through the city’s bylanes.
Walk around Srinagar and — if you remember
the early 1990s — it will strike you that the
mosques are making the same announcements,
about the march to the United Nations office,
about the blackout to be observed tonight to
protest the excessive use of force.
Listen to the vocabulary and you will know
that in so many ways it is worse today than in
the early 1990s, those watershed years when
Jammu and Kashmir started its slippery
descent. Listen to the Jammuites and this is
what they will throw at you: “All Kashmiris are
terrorists.” Listen to the Kashmiris and even a
six-year-old will say, “Water cannons to dispel
crowds in Jammu but bullets for us Kashmiris.”
The state I covered in 1990 was not a
communal cauldron. No Muslim had been
hurt in Jammu city or in the entire subdivision.
Today, it is a tinderbox. The communal
fire had almost been lit in Kishtwar in
Doda, where the population ratio is at a sensitive
52 to 48. MI-17s packed with security
forces were flown in from Jammu to keep the
fires from spreading but how long will the men
in khaki fill in for a government that is still
procrastinating? Chambers of commerce on
both sides are willing to “sacrifice” their businesses.
In Jammu, they are doing it in the name
of astha, faith, and in Kashmir, they are willing
to pay the price for what they call azadi.
If Omar Abdullah is threatening to resign
his seat in Parliament and if Mehbooba Mufti
is marching to the Raj Bhawan holding a placard
that says, “Stop the excessive use of force”,
they are doing so in recognition of the sentiment
in Kashmir. But more than that, their
actions also mean this: for the first time, it has
become difficult to distinguish the demands of
the mainstream parties from those of the
Hurriyat Conference who have no problem
with being called separatists. The mainstream
parties were always considered the bridge
between Srinagar and Delhi; today they are
part of the Muzaffarabad Chalo call.
The Gujarati tourists will not come back, or
may come only intermittently. The stalls selling
dosas opposite Srinagar’s Dal Lake may open
once again but will shut soon unless Delhi
wakes up and realises that the answer will not
flow from the barrel of a military gun. Ask
army commanders, perplexed by the numbers
of jawans killing themselves and their officers,
and they will tell you that here they are at best
tolerated and at worst are seen as an occupational
force. The new generation is brazen in
provoking the men in the bunkers. Not once
since 2000 has a crowd, however small,
marched to the UN office in Srinagar. Never
before has any strike, hartal or bandh in
Jammu ever gone into day two.
New Delhi will have to engage with the crisis
politically, not militarily. Violence embraced
Kashmir in the 1990s. In 2008, it has also taken
Jammu into its fold. Yesterday, India was taking
the peace process forward with Pakistan.
Today, it needs to broker peace between
Jammu and Kashmir. There are borders within
that need to be made irrelevant.
the separatist
THE AGITATION is not
about the yatra. Over five lakh yatris came this year and not one of them
was harmed. Kashmiris organised
 |
Kashmir
is a beautiful prison. Give us the right to self-determination
SYED ALI SHAH GEELANI,
Hurriyat Conference Leader |
langars for them and
will continue to do so. Governor SK Sinha misused his powers and got the
land transferred. He made another mistake by extending the yatra for two
months. What will happen to the environment? In Uttarakhand, the number
of pilgrims to the Gangotri are restricted to less than 300 a day, by
the BJP-run government. If there are restrictions there, why not here?
Today’s Kashmiri youth thinks that India wants them to be their ghulam.
They think the military will forcibly take their land away. Why is the
namaz not allowed in schools, when vande mataram is allowed? Jammu and
Kashmir is not an integral part of India. People are demanding the right
to self-determination which was promised by Nehru. You can keep saying
Kashmir is an integral part but remove the army and lets see how many
people say ‘Hindustan zindabad’. We are not communal; the BJP is. We will
protect the yatris with our lives. We don’t want to divide J&K. We will
preserve unity because Hindus are our brothers. There is only one solution:
we are in a beautiful prison. Please give us our freedom and the right
to selfdetermination. If the people decide to stay with India, we will
accept that but let India respect our rights.
the chauvinist
 |
Delhi
does not understand land is an identity issue
MEHBOOBA MUFTI,
President, Peoples Democratic Party
|
WE ARE being projected
as an anti-national force when we are the ones who have been pursuing
a healing-touch policy. Mufti Saab had the political acumen to stop the
land transfer three years ago because we knew it would become an atomic
bomb. Understand that Ghulam Nabi Azad conspired with Governor Sinha and
kept pressing for the transfer. Yes, PDP ministers were part of the Cabinet
meeting allotting the land but then Arun Kumar, the Chief Executive Officer,
played a dangerous game. He announced at a press conference that the facilities
that would come up on the 800 kanals would be permanent. He also talked
of Hindu pollution and Muslim pollution during Haj. Can a government officer
talk like this without powerful political backing? Delhi does not understand
that land is an identity issue. Everyone spoke up for Nandigram; why not
Kashmir? The whole country is siding with a 10- member Shrine Board committee.
Surely, the Shrine Board is not above Jammu and Kashmir, above India.
What you see right now is a people’s movement, not a militant movement.
The immediate solution lies in opening the Muzaffarabad route. If goods
can go through Wagah, why not Muzaffarabad? And please, tell Delhi to
think about Musharraf’s proposal on joint control. You can’t wish away
the problem.
the refugee
 |
Appoint
Pandits from the Valley to the Shrine Board. We are not outsiders
RATTAN CHAKU,
Kashmiri Pandit, Srinagar
|
WE HAVE lived through
the 1990s but today we are crying. Our Hindu brothers who migrated taunt
us. They tell us that we have converted, that we have started eating beef.
For the first one year after the migration, we did not exchange greetings
with our Kashmiri Muslim neighbours but then slowly the ties were restored.
Now, the tension is back. We cower when we hear the azadi slogans. This
is my janma bhoomi. I don’t want to leave but I am being forced to think
about it. I feel sad when I see the national flag being burnt. Mehbooba
Mufti’s party is to blame. Why are we not entitled to forest land? Why
can’t the yatris be entitled to better facilities? Is this not our country?
This crisis can be solved in five months if politicians take their eye
off the vote banks. You think Kashmiris want to go to Pakistan. Never.
Not one will cross over. Let them go and they will realise the value of
Kashmir. Before Jammu and Kashmir gets totally divided, appoint Pandits
from the Valley as members of the Shrine Board. That way our Kashmiri
brothers will not feel insecure and think that the land is being taken
away from them.
the secularist
 |
I
blame the previous
governor, Lt Gen Sinha
YUSUF TARIGAMI,
J&K’s sole CPM MLA |
ONLY THREE months
ago, political activity was at its peak. Each seat had upto four contenders
for the October elections. Now there is a question mark on the elections.
The issue of alienation has not been addressed. Kashmiris resent ‘Indian’
domination through the security grid and in Jammu the feeling is that
it is only the Valley leadership that dominates. I blame the previous
governor, Lt Gen Sinha. When he took charge in 2003, he started visiting
district headquarters. No governor has any business doing that. I met
Prime Minister Vajpayee and complained and also wrote a letter to the
deputy prime minister, LK Advani. Why should we have a Muslim chief minister
in charge of the Muslim Auqaf Board and a Hindu governor as chairman of
the Amarnath Yatra Shrine Board. Sinha has done the greatest disservice
by pressing for the transfer of land. The state is now not just regionally
divided but communally divided. I was not frightened in 1990 but the situation
has changed for the worse. There is only one permanent solution — maximum
autonomy for the state. Make regional councils with constitutional guarantees.
the victims
I USED TO have a beautiful
house in the Valley and my wife’s family had apple orchards. Those are
just memories now and we pay
 |
The
only way forward is through dialogue. Kashmir is our watan
SHIDAN LAL AND SUNITA KAUL, Kashmiri Pandit migrants, Jammu |
Rs
50 a kilo to buy fruit for our sons. How can we forget Kashmir? It is
our watan, our janam bhoomi. I am posted in the postal department in Srinagar
and have joined my wife and two sons in Jammu because of the agitation
in the Valley. I am scared of even stepping out of the General Post Office
where we live under Central Reserve Police Force security. In the 1990s,
posters had come up in mohallas asking the Pandits to leave. This time,
I’m not sure we can leave alive because it has become so communal.
My wife often thinks
of home and says, Kashmir toh jannat ka nazara tha (Kashmir was like viewing
Paradise). Imagine the tragedy— my children have only been there once
as tourists. Now, the agitation has spread through Jammu and everyone
says, why can’t the government give us Bhole Nath’s land?
I want peace and security. We are all brothers. The
only way forward is through dialogue. I believe they
should give us the land and if the two sides sit together,
they (the Kashmiris) too will understand that we are
not going to construct an Amarnath Nagar there. We
just want to offer prayers. Give us the land and we will
pray for peace — for both Jammu and Kashmir.
the pilgrim
 |
It’s
not about land. It’s
about discrimination
PRINCE KHAJURIA, Amarnath Yatri |
I HAVE BEEN undertaking
the yatra to the Amarnath cave for the last three years. My friends and
I offer our prayers to Bhole Nath and then go to Gulmarg on holiday. But
unlike before, I did not feel safe this time. But that was only after
we reached Srinagar where large crowds were protesting. On the yatra route,
however, we had no problem at all. The Kashmiri Muslims took care of us.
They carry yatris on their backs and rush them to medical camps set up
en route. All rescue operations are done by the locals. Even in Srinagar,
our taxi driver taught us two Kashmiri sentences — warre chhu (how are
you?), so we don’t come across as Hindus to the protestors. When we stayed
in a houseboat on the Dal Lake, we were charged Rs 2,000 but others were
charged Rs 5,000. When we asked the owner, why, he said, they are Hindus.
I have Muslim friends in Jammu but unlike in the Valley, they don’t see
us just as Hindus. If it’s only about land, I’ll say, you keep 400 of
the 800 kanals and we’ll keep 400, but it’s about discrimination against
Jammu. Even Jammu politicians give preference to Kashmir. Jammu has more
voters but we have only 37 seats. Kashmir has 46. Kashmir sends three
MPs to Parliament; we send two. The last Cabinet had 14 ministers from
Kashmir and only five from Jammu. Correct all this if you want the agitation
to stop.
the moderate
 |
The
Centre will be forced to grant maximum
autonomy
FAROOQ ABDULLAH,
National Conference leader |
TODAY, A new generation
is out on the streets. Their seniors have realised that the gun failed
their agitation but this generation does not fear death. The divide between
Jammu and Kashmir is growing dangerously and will have disastrous consequences
for the subcontinent. What was the necessity of playing with the Shrine
Board? Now, the Amarnath issue has receded. But Jammu is talking of neglect.
The economic blockade led to a feeling amongst the Kashmiris that their
lifeline was being choked, triggering the Muzaffarbad Chalo agitation.
If there was an easy road to Tibet, they would have marched towards that.
I begged Rajnath Singh and Arun Jaitley to not have an all-India agitation
saying it will internationalise the Kashmir issue again. I told them it
could lead to a Gujarat-like situation. I fear Muslims in the rest of
India will be affected. In the last 10 days of the yatra, only those who
could afford air travel came to Srinagar. Even in the 1990s, the highway
was never blocked. Let the Sangharsh Samiti hold talks with the Action
Committee. The only permanent solution is maximum autonomy and the Centre
will be forced to grant it.
the agitator
 |
It’s
a matter of faith. Restore the land to the Shrine Board
BRIG (RETD) SUCHET SINGH, Member, Amarnath Yatra Sangharsh Samiti |
IT IS a matter of
faith. We got together and passed a resolution that all leaders from Jammu
will be boycotted if they support Ghulam Nabi Azad in the trust vote.
Now, we have Congress and National Conference leaders from Jammu supporting
us. The agitation is not Jammu versus Kashmir. We have nothing against
the common Kashmiri. We will not talk to the Kashmiri leaders because
criminals cannot become judges. Former Governor Sinha kept asking for
the land to be transferred to the Shrine Board but of course, everyone
is only worried about Kashmir. And now Kashmiris say they extend facilities
to yatris. Don’t make it sound like charity. The yatris pay for their
tents and ponies. It is a mass movement and has reached every mohalla.
Even if we want to stop it now, we can’t. There is only one solution —
restore the land to the Shrine Board and change Governor NN Vohra. The
governor asked the President of the Chamber of Commerce about economic
losses during the hartal and he said, Rs 183 crore. Then stop the agitation,
he suggested and the reply was, we want our honour back even if we lose
Rs 183, 000 crore. |