| From
Tehelka Magazine, Vol 5, Issue 35, Dated Sept 06, 2008 |
|
| |
More Than A
Nano Storm
Skilfully exploiting the Tata-Singur fracas, Mamata Banerjee is
beginning to rattle the ruling Left Front in West Bengal. Can
she now inject some corporate savvy into her earthy politics to
carry the day? An on-the-spot report by SHANTANU GUHA RAY
FOR HOURS on August 24, Tarit
Sikdar stood under a blazing
sun that made him swelter
and tire. An executive with
the State Bank of India, Sikdar
had traveled over three
hours to join the anti-Nano
rally, which brought more
than 800,000 to Singur, to hear Mamata Banerjee
perched atop a makeshift dais overlooking
Tata Motors’ Nano plant.
 |
People’s power Mamata
Banerjee is riding high on
her recent success in the
May Panchayat polls |
Every now and then, the Trinamool leader
interrupted her co-speakers with her one-liners
that included warning her supporters to
practice restraint and not gatecrash the plant.
Sikdar, who follows politics like many in West
Bengal, understood why Banerjee was super
alert: this is a moment that could actually catapult
her into a position of formidable opposition
sorely missing in the three decades of the
state’s Marxist rule.
A hundred miles away, in the air-conditioned
comfort of the imposing Writers Building, the
seat of the state government in Kolkata, sat Chief
Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharya, surrounded
by half his Cabinet who constantly updated him
on their rival’s movement. CPM insiders admit
that hours before the start of the Singur rally, the
Left Front — a bloc of 13 political parties – had
no gameplan to take on the feisty leader. Political
observers in the state admit that the last time
the entire Left Front went in an overdrive to
keep the opposition at bay (it was Mamata then,
too) was over a decade ago when TMC and Left
Front supporters openly clashed in the heart of
the city, leaving hundreds — including Banerjee
— injured in hospital.
“She is riding a tiger but then, till now, she
has been riding it successfully,” says Congress
politician Nirbed Roy. “She is eyeing the Writers
Building and this is her biggest comeback
chance. The Left Front is genuinely worried
because someone else is also getting to control
the crowds, and the votes.”
A former TMC leader, Roy should know. Crucial
to the context is not industrialisation but the politics of power. Consider this from Banerjee at
the Singur rally: “We do not want the car over
the farmers’ tears.” The instant thunderous
response from her supporters swung on a different
agenda: Lal Bhagao, Bangla Bachchao.
Who cares about Nano when the focus is on
wresting power from the Left?
Expectedly, many agree that the importance
of the current anti-Tata agitation lies in consolidating
the TMC votebank, which swelled after
party workers last year forced Indonesia’s Salim
Group to abandon Nandigram and set up its
chemical hub in the adjacent region of Nayachar.
Last May, TMC won two Zila Parishads
out of 17 and nearly bagged four more. What
does it mean for those oblivious of rural power?
Two Bangla TV news channels recently predicted
that TMC could pick up 20 of West Bengal’s
42 Lok Sabha seats if elections are held
today. But many say Banerjee needs to know
where to draw the line.
“She is the Mayawati of the East, the buck
stops with her,” says the state’s Urban Development
Minister, Kshiti Goswami. “She should
have actually entered into a negotiation with
the Tatas and the state government and
worked out a compensation for the farmers.
That she is aiming for the rural vote bank is
amply clear.”
TATA MOTORS, India’s biggest truck
maker, which bought the Jaguar and
Land Rover luxury units from Ford
Motor Corporation for about $2.4 billion last
June, is betting that its ultra-low priced Nano
will entice first-time car buyers in India where
more than 45 million people use motorcycles.
Tata supremo Ratan Tata unveiled the car in
February at an auto fair in New Delhi and said
it would roll out in October this year.
 |
No trade Trucks with
perishable goods are
stuck on the highway
Photos: Tumpa Mondal |
Auto experts say the 623-cc Nano is crucial
for Tata Motors to boost sales as seven-yearhigh
interest rates and the fastest inflation in
more than 16 years have dampened demand for
vehicles in India. Worse, Tata’s sales fell 8.9
percent in July, while car sales in India dropped
1.7 percent, the first monthly decline since
November 2005. The group also has competition
from Renault SA, France’s second-largest
carmaker, and its affiliate Nissan Motor Co.,
which plan to build a $2,500 car in India with
Bajaj Auto Limited as partner. The car, codenamed
ULC, is expected to go on sale in 2011 to
challenge Nano as the nation’s cheapest car
Tata’s trouble with the villagers started last
year when the state government started acquiring the land. Of the 997 acres allocated for the
project, 70 percent is already acquired. Nearly
11,000 land title-holders have had no problems
with the project. Those owning around 400
acres of land are the holdouts for whom Mamata
Banerjee is fighting. She has demanded land, not
money, as compensation for them. The crisis is
handy for Banerjee, who has been for almost a
decade espousing the farmers’ cause in the state.
Her critics say she only wants rural votes.
“Rubbish. Didn’t the Left seek the rural votes
to cock a snook at Kolkata for decades?” asks
Derek O’Brien, India’s top quizzer who is
currently a key advisor to the TMC. “India needs
industrialisation with a human face,” says
O’Brien, arguing that his party has been consistent
in its demand and not played a game of
shifty politics like the Left. “They are saying
sorry for the misses in the last 30 years and
hyping the Nano plant as the state’s only saviour.
That’s ridiculous.”
O’Brien’s arguments are perfectly in place.
Insiders say he was instrumental in pushing
Banerjee to publicise that the state government
had not made public its memorandum of
understanding with the Tatas but were
clamouring to see the one the UPA Government
had signed with the US for the 123 nuke deal.
The media lapped it up and Bhattacharya & Co
were suitably embarrassed.
BY TAKING on the Red Brigade lock, stock
and barrel, Banerjee has triggered one of
the biggest challenges for the ruling Left
Front. To be sure, Banerjee has a big gap to
cover to make a dash at power in West Bengal.
In the last Assembly elections of 2006, her party
crashed to just 29 seats out of 294. Five years
earlier, that tally had stood at 80. Yet, such is the
alarm at her revival, that Left Front Chairman
Biman Bose, who is also the CPM state secretary,
calls the current imbroglio in the state as “Left
is Right and Right is Left”. Earlier, many could
call it apocryphal but no longer. Reminded of
Banerjee’s astounding victories in the panchayat
elections of May, Bose simply says: “One swallow
does not make a summer.
Rejecting the demand of land for land, Bose
wants to take the battle back to Banerjee. “Let
TMC come back to the table to ascertain the actual
number of unwilling farmers. Our figures
show only 167 acres belong to genuinely unwilling
farmers. But TMC is demanding 400 acres.
Whatever the figure, there is no point in holding
talks if they continue to insist on the return of
any portion of the project area. They need to talk
and not create chaos.”
Adds the state’s Industry Minister, Nirupam
Sen: “Disruption of work cannot continue for
long. TMC has to show the people of Bengal
that its agenda is better than ours. She has
none.” (see interview)
But political grandstanding apart, the pressure
is mounting on the Left Front, as State
Transport Minister Subhas Chakraborty admits.
He now seeks to run down Banerjee by saying
the Left Front Government had helped Indian
Railways acquire 40,000 acres when Banerjee
was railway minister in Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s government. “It happened the same way land
was acquired in Singur. Now tell me, if those
who gave land then claim they were unwilling,
is it possible to return that land? Once a mechanism
sets in, then it is difficult to reverse the
process,” Chakraborty told TEHELKA.
That the Left is worried is reflected in statements
made by the party’s various leaders.
After Banerjee denied that she was “anti-industry”,
Chief Minister Bhattacharya told a
meeting of the Associated Chambers of Commerce
and Industry on August 26 that he
“hated bandhs” or shutdowns, a statement that
was unthinkable by a Left leader till recently.
“These are anti-growth. Shutdowns do not
help anyone. I personally do not support
strikes. It is not helping us. Unfortunately, I
belong to a party and when they call strikes, I
keep mum. But I have finally decided that the
next time I will open my mouth,” the chief minister
told the interactive session.
 |
Left crisis More than
six lakh joined the TMC
rally outside the plant |
BUT THEN, pressures are mounting. While
solving the Nano crisis remained uppermost
on the minds of the mandarins of
Alimuddin Street, the headquarters of the CPM,
another issue worrying the state was the impact
of the TMC Singur sit-in: traffic blockade on the
four-lane Durgapur Expressway that allows fast
communication between Kolkata and Durgapur
and is the state’s busiest freight corridor. Transport
Minister Chakraborty said soon, food
prices may be badly hit as many of the 25,000
trucks stranded by the shutdown are carrying
perishable goods and are incurring losses of Rs 2
crore a day. But Banerjee would not budge from
her stand, saying it was the state government,
and not her party, that was responsible for it.
TMC members strongly believe that the ruling
coalition is getting desperate. “The Left is a
victim of its own game plan. It came to power
on a huge rural vote, telling the world that
Capitalists are friends of none,” says Partha
Chatterjee, a top TMC member and leader of
the opposition in the state assembly.
“Then, for three decades, they did nothing
to further the cause of the state’s
growth. Now, pushed to the wall, they
have started clamouring for growth and are
clinging to a single project”.
Sitting close, Banerjee merely smiles. On
the face of it, she is not denying that she and
her party are still weaklings in face of the
massive Red power, and that she has a long
way to go if she has to effectively dislodge
Bhattacharya and his company from
power. In the early 1980s, the Left Front
unveiled agrarian reforms that helped formalise
land holdings and cropping patterns
and also consolidate votes in rural Bengal.
Whenever the grip loosened, the prowess of
the Left Front’s 1.6 million cadre ensured its
brute support. But Banerjee, with victories in
Nandigram and Singur, has proved even the
cadres can be pushed back. That is a great
psychological victory.
“I am not saying safeguarding the farmers
rights is my only agenda. We need to put Bengal
back on the growth path,” Banerjee told
TEHELKA (see interview).
She says Singur is not the only one in crisis.
The Barasat-Raichak Expressway, a multi-lane
highway that was to connect the Kolkata airport
with the Haldia port, is on hold. Earlier,
the chemical hub in Nandigram was abandoned
in the face of violent protests. Although
there is talk of relocating the chemical hub to
Nayachar, top bureaucrats say it has been put
on the backburner considering the huge investment
and environmental clearances involved.
A giant power plant planned in the
Burdwan district had to be shelved because of
protests over land acquisition. The DLF’s proposed
township in Dankuni over an area of
nearly 4,500 acres and an investment of over
Rs 30,000 crore is also hanging fire
Banerjee also knows that in her pursuit of
the chief minister’s chair in the Writers Building,
she has to checkmate what Bengal’s top
writer Moni Shankar Mukherjee calls a race of
denial that is causing India’s biggest migration.
On an average, more than 25,000 young graduates
leave West Bengal every year for better
opportunities in other states. Some go abroad.
The figure, as per state government records, is
the highest among all Indian states.
“For generations, we have viewed everything
with suspicion and eventually, ended
up with nothing. Can someone change this?
Looks tough,” quips Mukherjee at his sprawling
office of the Calcutta Electric Supply
Corporation (CESC), once a state government
organisation, now owned by the Rs 11,000
crore RPG Group of Enterprises.
Interestingly, almost two decades ago, a
predicament similar to the Tatas’ was faced by
the RPG Group, when they were the frontrunners
for the much-hyped Haldia Petrochemicals
that the Left Front Government had then
showcased as the state’s starting block for
global investment. But the Rs 5000 crore project
went to the Tatas. Many had found the
move completely out of sync because the RPG
Group, unlike the Tatas, had shown more investment
promise in the state. Nearly two
decades later, as the same government struggles
to appease the Tatas and TMC to seal the
Nano deal, a climate of unpredictability clouds
the atmosphere. Mukherjee suggests that
Banerjee is walking a tightrope, for any leader
that wishes to seize power in Bengal will have
to engage with industry: “Any new leader must
help change this mindset and put the state back
on the rails. Gimmicks won’t work.”
Agrees Harshvardhan Neotia, CMD of cement
major Bengal Ambuja: “Getting projects
off the ground is almost the same everywhere
but there are states where you get an advantage
because of the positive climate. It exists in
patches in Bengal. It needs to change if Bengal
is seeking the big bucks investment.
Neotia should know. At least nine German
business delegations slated to visit India between
now and December have not included
Kolkata in their itinerary possibly because of the
Singur imbroglio. Some of these delegations are
from the key German states of Bavaria, Lower
Saxony and Baden-Wurttemberg, with whom
the state government has been trying to forge
closer ties to transform Bengal into an automobile
hub. Bavaria, the largest German state, is
home to car major BMW. Lower Saxony is the
headquarters of auto manufacturer Volkswagen.
Baden-Wurttemberg is home to Daimler and
Porsche. “Last year, we had seven German
delegations coming to Kolkata. Unfortunately,
the current turbulence has put a spanner in the
wheel,” says BG Roy, regional director of Indo-
German Chamber of Commerce.
But says TMC Rajya Sabha MPMukul Roy: “It
will help the nation understand that despite the
industry-friendly face of the chief minister, on
ground nothing much is happening in West
Bengal because of serious anomalies in the
projects planned by the state government. We
need to change the climate.”
 |
Stop Nano Tatas have
suspended work at their
plant in Singur |
Indian Chamber of Commerce president
Harsh K. Jha says the state needs a total overhaul.
“It is like almost acquiring a new house because
the present structure is worth only a demolition.”
He offers an interesting one to highlight the
crisis. Bengal’s much-publicised single-window
clearance actually takes 105 man-days to complete
the process. “It takes one day in Gujarat,
and two days in Karnataka and Maharashtra but
obtaining and registering property is the most
time-consuming process in this state.” Jha and
his team has already recommended a slew of
measures in a report on the single-window
system to help the West Bengal Government
attract more investments.
Banerjee once jokingly said she could relent
if the poor in Bengal get 100,000 free Nano
cars. In a move that could have wide ranging
ramifications, she has already rejected Chief
Minister Bhattacharjee’s appeal for talks because
it came with the rider that she allow the
project to go ahead. “If the Left Front Government
can go to the people with the 123 nuclear
deal as their political plank, what’s wrong in
this movement? At least she is raising some
valid points, right?” asks Somen Mitra, who recently
quit the Congress Party to float his own.
“The state’s records say Bengal has more than
seven million unemployed. All of them, I hope,
are not seeking jobs at the Tata plant. Even the
much-hyped Haldia Petrochemicals could
actually employ less than 500 people at their
plant. Look at the way the Left has messed up
the industrial climate. The Birlas, who had 550
acres of land for their Ambassador car, recently
said they just did not use 314 acres and now
they want to turn it into a real estate venture.
And the state government agreed. And here, it
is raising a hue and cry over 400 acres of highly
fertile land,” says Mitra in arguments that are
increasingly finding acceptability across the
state. Many say his support to Banerjee is
crucial because Mitra is still considered an
influential vote swinger in the state.
His voice echoes in Singur where Dipankar
Ghosh, the deputy village head of Berabari
Gram Panchayat, argues for a pension from the
government. Ghosh, whose cousin works for
the Tatas at the plant, says it is important to
understand that agriculture and machinery can
grow side by side. “Why kill one for the other?”
AMILE AWAy, Ananta Sahu and Tarun
Sahu sit in the shade of their family garden
and wonder when work will
resume. They both trained for six months in
Kolkata before joining as trainees at the Singur
plant. Their salary: Rs 1,700 plus food and
perks that total Rs 4,500. Both have been
unemployed for more than two years after
graduating from a local college. “Some villagers
want the plant, some others don’t. This isn’t
good,” said Sahu. “We could soon become outcaste
in the village for working in the plant.
Someone needs to solve the crisis.”
Banerjee knows the implication of the showdown
because the crux of the crisis is not the
issue of the ancillary factories, for which the
Tatas want the extra land, nor it is about whether
the farmers got adequate compensation or
whether India actually needs Nano for its roads.
It revolves around Banerjee’s best chance to
make it to the top in the state, taking advantages
of the 30-year-old mess of the Left rule.
“It is important for Mamata Banerjee to
keep the Nano project in the state because that
will be her message to the corporates,” says
Arun Poddar, a top builder.
Banerjee knows the Tatas will lose some
money if the project moves elsewhere and that
India will lose some global shine if the universally-
anticipated $2,500 car suffers a delay. But
if she can keep the signature project in the
state and win over the farmers at the same
time, she would actually transform Bengal’s
image of a state that instills fear in the heart of
the doughtiest capitalist.
That’s a big call. Banerjee needs to understand
that, and work her way up: Perhaps only
then she can genuinely start her ascent to the
chief minister’s chair. • |