|
|
|
| Editor’s
Cut
 |
Harinder
Baweja on the investigation, method and the timing of the exposé
Watch
Video |
Lest We Forget Our Shame
HARINDER
BAWEJA
FOR ALL of us at TEHELKA, Gujarat 2002: The Truth is the
most important investigation of our time. Some may argue against this
but in so many ways, it is more urgent than Operation West End. Exposing
corruption in the procurement of arms was critical. That the gravy chain
ran long and deep — through top political echelons — was a
revelation in the national interest.
But unlike West End, which dealt with greed and avarice, Gujarat is about
our fundamentals. It is about ourselves. It is important because the hopelessly
one-sided perpetration of violence on hapless Muslims is one of the biggest
ruptures of recent times. A corrosive rupture. A nation’s shame.
We all knew that the State had conspired in the events of 2002. That the
rioters — or is assassins the right word? — had political
protection. But we had no faces. The perpetrators were part of large amorphous
mobs. We didn’t know the details. We had no idea of the extent to
which the masters and their men plotted and executed the genocide.
 |
| Photo:
Reuters |
This investigation lays bare the anatomy of the rioters.
The groundbreaking exposé — entirely the work of one gutsy,
truth-hungry journalist, armed with nothing but two buttonsized cameras
— takes the lid off all that was known but never established. The
chilling details come first hand, from the accused themselves. The accused
damn themselves — they tell us how everything, every last thing
was planned and thought through. How bombs were manufactured in factories
owned by members of the Sangh Parivar. How arms were smuggled in from
other states. How, for the men in uniform, the colour saffron meant more
than khaki. How Narendra Modi, custodian of the law, volunteered to let
his state resemble a killing field.
The revelations are important because they are entirely voluntary. They
were not made under any inducement. Wads of notes were not brandished
to elicit them. Extraordinary stories need extraordinary methods, we often
say. This extraordinary investigation, in fact, is an account of what
the killers willingly narrated to the reporter who approached them as
a student researching Hindu resurgence. What they said was checked and
cross-checked — through field visits, through other accused.
Some were cautious, but most were willing to talk with a little bit of
goading. They gave out horrifying details without batting an eyelid. Their
testimonies are not just an insight into their mindsets — they are
accounts that should have been in official police records — in FIRs
and chargesheets. Accounts that fit different sections of the IPC. Accounts
that lend themselves to the criminal procedure code. Babu Bajrangi, the
Bajrang Dal zealot, confesses to how he slashed open a pregnant woman’s
womb and wrenched the foetus out.
Suresh Richard, an accused in the Naroda Patiya massacre, confesses to
rape. He tells you he is not lying, because he is admitting to it in the
presence of his wife. He tells also of how he and his fellows killed Muslims
when they heard that some of them were hiding in a gutter, hoping to escape
the marauding mobs. Haresh Bhatt, a sitting MLA, similarly needs to be
questioned, to be proceeded against because he reveals how rocket launchers
were assembled in a factory owned by him. In over 40 hours of tape, none,
save one of the protagonists, expressed any remorse. Frighteningly, they
all said they would like to kill many more.
THIS INVESTIGATION is important for so many reasons, the two most important
being that the Police and the Judiciary — the two pillars that ordinary
Indians bank on — stand naked. Two public prosecutors are on camera
acknowledging allegiance to their faith over their profession —
paying homage to a warped sense of religion over nobility of duty. Details
of how they are actually working to help the guilty escape the law. How
they have even turned brokers and have already helped an accused —
who had used a sword to cut a man to pieces — by offering money
to the victim’s family.
This story is about the subversion that continues at different levels,
political and judicial. The Gujarat government’s own counsel casts
aspersions on the two-member Nanavati-Shah Commission. It took us six
months to unearth the startling truth behind Gujarat 2002. Five years
since, it is clear why the government in the state is not interested in
delivering justice to its own victims.
The investigation begs attention. We need police reforms urgently. Thousands
of victims — eyewitnesses to the genocide — are looking for
justice to courts outside Gujarat. A Delhi High Court bench recently took
suo motu notice of reports that pointed a finger at YK Sabharwal, the
former chief justice of India. This investigation deserves all the attention
the judiciary can pay it. It is a nation’s shame. Our collective
shame.
|
|
Nov
03, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|