Archives
CHANNELS
 Current Affairs
 Engaged Circle
 De-Classified
 Edit -Opinion
 Society & Lifestyle
 Features
 Bouquets & Bricks
 Business & Economy
 Archives
People Power
Wanted: Your story

THE HUB

The udder state of my home

Other Articles of the Series
PART I The udder state of my home
PART II MINDING OUR Ms AND Ps
PART III POLITICS IS THE JOB I DO
Part lament, part provocation, in the first of a three-part series, Sonia biographer and GenNext politician from UP, Yusuf Ansari grapples with the riddle of the Hindi heartland and his presence in it

I was born a little too late to judge whether the Emergency was indeed independent India’s darkest period and just early enough for the it ‘revolution’ to have skipped my infant years. Yet the timing of my birth made me a perfect victim for the diabolical political movements which tore through India in the early 1990s. Like precision-guided bombs, both the Mandal agitation and the Ayodhya movement converged to explode smack at the start of what psychologists would perhaps call my ‘most impressionable years’. I was a marked man long before Islamophobia became fashionable in the global political lexicon. In fact, I can even remember the moment of my first confrontation with political realities — it was 1990, the day that Laloo Prasad Yadav stopped LK Advani’s rath yatra and arrested him at Samastipur. I was 12 years old, in boarding school at the Welham Boys’ School. Uttaranchal had not yet been created and Dehra Dun was still a part of UP. Groups of boys, many barely older than me, some even, until that time, friends went around saying, “Mandir vahin banayenge.” I had no idea what they were talking about, was not even sure where Ayodhya lay and certainly remember someone asking me, “Babri Masjid kis chidiya ka naam hai?” I had no idea. But I did know that my generation, hardly into its teens, had already been politicised. The next year I was sent to boarding school in England and it was here, on 6 December, 1992, just over a month before my fourteenth birthday, that I learned exactly where Ayodhya was and what the Babri Masjid signified.

Yusuf Ansari
Up until that time, the spirit of Uttar Pradesh was manifested to me through the looking glass of a genteel childhood. I was born in Allahabad in 1978, and the inherent civility of the kayastha was transmitted to me by the doctor who delivered me at the Kamala Nehru Hospital. In ancient Benaras, as I faced death after a severe accident, I gratefully witnessed the charity of a Brahmin who saved me by a transfusion of his Hindu blood into my Muslim veins. The first Muharram processions that I saw as a child were atop the shoulders of my Dalit guardians, Narsinh and Bijaiyya, at our ancestral home of Yusufpur, in Ghazipur district. Once a feudal seat, Yusufpur is a political bastion with at least one member of my family in Parliament or the Assembly at one time or another. My great-grandfather had been a Congress president and my grandfather’s own commitment to the party was absolute. I visited him at Naini jail near Allahabad, a proud two-year-old in my mother’s arms waving a Congress flag, when he had voluntarily gone to jail, to protest Mrs Indira Gandhi’s arrest. It was nothing heartbreaking. The heartbreak did happen, but much later.

In 1992, our home in Yusufpur, founded in the late 1480s by my ancestor Ghazi Mohammad Yusuf Ansari, was raided by companies of the pac. Furniture was smashed, portraits broken, trophies torn down. The atmosphere in the surrounding villages and kasbas was poisoned, invocations to caste and community were raised, Pakistan was mentioned. Political realities had finally, literally come home. By the time I turned 17, in 1995, my baptism was already complete. I could not continue living in up if I was not a part of its politics; for myself, I could not live outside of up. As soon as my education was complete I returned home, to Uttar Pradesh.

 
All its enrichment has made Purvanchal a museum, for there’s little of a viable future reflected in its everyday life. Today, it’s synonymous with lawlessness, entrenched poverty and terrible violence
The largest proportion of India’s Brahmins, Muslims and Dalits reside in Uttar Pradesh, making its society the most complex social construct in the country. Yet, what happens to a society caught between the crush of poverty and the curse of stagnation? What happens to a society without social consciousness, one whose leaders have lost all sensitivity and are guided only by personal/political compulsions? Does such a society descend into anarchy? Does it give rise to revolution? In all probability, no, not in up. There will be no social upheaval, no mass agitations, no demonstrations of the loss of patience and hope by the people of India’s most populous province. The people of up will not rise up in anger because there is no one to rise up against, no single specific regime towards which to direct our outrage, no individual who is responsible for the mass misery. The people of up have been failed not by individuals but by that greatest hope of the 20th century: democracy. How does a populace protest against the system which itself is the guarantor of its rights and liberties? The people of up have themselves to blame for lending themselves to the national experiments carried out in the name of Indian democracy, for allowing rhetoric to replace reality as the guiding compass of our social and political engagements.

UTTAR PRADESH paid the price for being a very complex, sophisticated society when its diverse social mileu became the test-site for the left wing ‘atom-bomb’ of caste politics which, having exploded here, carried its vapours to other parts of the country. Similarly, because it was a cultural cradle for Hinduism and a secular beacon through its ‘Ganga-Jamuni tehzib’, the right wing selected it as the test tube for its own communal experiments. Consequently, all that is left of up now is its direct and singular identification with politics, political volatility and the complete politicisation of every aspect of its life. Today, one will run out of numbers before one can finish counting the names of up’s political ‘activists’, their vulgarity displayed on bill-boards and posters in every corner of every city, kasba and village of the state. In the last year, up has witnessed the murder of two mlas; sectarian riots that claimed the lives of a dozen people; intense Naxal/Maoist violence in at least three districts; spiralling crimes against women; bomb explosions in Benaras; and a huge spurt in gun culture of the kind previously associated with Bihar.

As I have said, my roots lie in the land Mark Tully memorably described as ‘the heart of India’: Purvanchal, literally meaning ‘the eastern edge’. Of the 13 prime ministers of India, six belonged to and/or represented eastern up. Culturally and historically too, Purvanchal is a national repository — the Buddha preached his first sermon here, Tulsi Das penned his version of the Ramayana on the banks of the Ganga in Varanasi, Humayun lost his empire to Sher Shah Suri near Chandauli. In modern times, Purvanchal produced not just a string of political heavyweights but litterateurs and intellectuals such as Munshi Premchand, Harivansh Rai Bachchan and Kaifi Azmi. Most of Purvanchalis a vast, flat block with some of the richest soil in the country. The Mirzapur-Bhadohi belt is the epicentre of India’s weaving and carpet manufacturing industry. The power looms of Mau and Azamgarh produce some of the finest cloth woven anywhere. Mughalserai has historically been and still is a massive transport junction. The geographical location of Amethi and Sultanpur make the area a potential hub for the energy sector. Allahabad is one of the holiest spots on earth for a Hindu. The Benaras Hindu University has an ancient tradition of learning. So much enrichment has inevitably made Purvanchal a museum, for there is little of a viable future reflected in its everyday life. Synonymous with lawlessness, terrible violence, entrenched poverty and an apathetic and ineffective administrative infrastructure, Purvanchal is now not just on the geographical edge of up but on the furthest edges of an otherwise, largely progressive India.

Yet, if you speak to some of the administrative pawns (it is difficult to dignify them by terms such as ‘officer’), they insist that up is one of the best governed states in India! Question their assertion and before you can say Uttar Pradesh they will tell you, “Because the Mau and Aligarh riots were controlled within 24 hours.” And sadly it is this clique of abbreviations — the dm’s, sdm’s, sho’s, co’s, cdo’s, adm’s and other such alphabetical personae — that is responsible for the running of our lives. If you ever have the misfortune of watching the local cable networks in up’s cities, you will notice that the majority of advertisements on these telecasts are from private enterprises devoted to the mass production of ias and pcs officers. Their syllabus: a perverse pastiche ‘taught’ by mediocre minds that never developed their own intellect. Horror being bred for servitude, to serve illiterate masters who will perpetuate and further this horror. Why, we have to ask ourselves, is there such a rush for pcs vacancies and no corresponding desire or urge to join the private sphere in Uttar Pradesh? Are we not also members of that same national community which is one of the world’s fastest growing economies?

Throughout its rural and semi-urban landscape the mass production of poverty is underway. What is being engineered is not just material poverty but a regression in thought and a large-scale murder of vision. The horrors of Gujarat are at least veiled behind an illusion of progress in that state; in up, human tragedies are naked, in-your-face and self-evident. up and its people have been cornered and comprehensively defeated by the system and the political culture which that system breeds. Each of India’s other states demonstrates against the system (if it has to) as a singular, regional unit. The Gujaratis speak of Gujrati gaurav and asmita; the Marathis talk of Maratha shakti; Bengalis are staunchly and singularly Bengali about their identity and Punjabis have their own means to address appeals to the national consciousness. Has anyone ever heard a single voice from up demanding rights for the state and its people on the basis of our regional identity? No, because up has always been congruous and seen to be indivisible from the Indian whole. up will continue to be India and vice versa. That is why the problems of Uttar Pradesh are naturally reflective of a national crisis. The truth is: the state of up is, unfortunately for the moment, the condition of India.

The writer is a member of the up Congress Committee and
has also authored Triumph of Will: Sonia Gandhi

Jun 03 , 2006
 

Print this story Feedback Add to favorites Email this story

  About Us | Who’s Who@Tehelka | Advertise With Us | Print Subscriptions | Syndication | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Contact Us | Bouquets & Brickbats