|
|
|
|
Critical Case
AIDS and law
Impact: Failure to provide treatment to
HIV/AIDS patients is a violation of Right to Life under Article 21
By
Parul Sharma
 |
Parul
Sharma |
| |
The government’s
stand is
highly moralistic — preaching sexual abstinence rather than
making condoms available |
Anjaiah, his wife,
and six children were thrown out of their village in Cudappah district
of Andhra Pradesh when Anjaiah was diagnosed hiv positive. The government
hospitals also refused to admit him. Anjaiah died a couple of days later.
Similarly, on being refused admission in a government hospital for being
hiv positive, Damayanti had to deliver her baby in the hospital corridor.
She even cut the umbilical cord herself. The incident did not take place
in a remote corner of India but in its capital. And, when Narsaiyya tested
positive for hiv, he was the last to learn. The doctor chose to inform
the villagers first, even though medical ethics demand that the patient
be informed first.
Article 21 imposes an obligation on the State to safeguard the Right to
Life of every person. Failure to provide timely medical treatment results
in violation of his Right to Life guaranteed under Article 21.
The government’s stand is highly moralistic — preaching sexual
abstinence and faithfulness to an unwilling population rather than making
condoms available. There are only 25 community hiv/aids care centres across
the country.
The latest Human Rights Watch (hrw) report from 2004 (Future Forsaken)
recognises that children, especially girls, are extremely vulnerable to
societal prejudice. Apart from millions of children living with hiv/aids,
many others are either orphaned or forced to withdraw from school to take
care of their sick parents. According to the report, there are approximately
1.2 million Indian children under the age of 15 who have lost one parent
or both to aids.
The Convention on the Rights of the Child in Article 24 recognises the
right of children to enjoy “the highest attainable standard of health
and to facilities for the treatment of illness and rehabilitation of health.”
Seven-year-old Purnima’s parents died of aids. But, before taking
her life Purnima’s mother poisoned her. Similarly, 13-year-old Dinesh’s
father died of aids a year before hrw met Dinesh. Their mother, who was
also hiv-positive, had committed suicide some five months before.
The refusal to treat and perform surgical operations, denial of admission
in hospitals, marking hiv positive on the beds occupied by patients, refusal
to touch objects used by hiv positive patients, wrapping of dead bodies
of hiv positive patients in plastic, imposing additional charges for basic
services are some of the discriminatory practices faced.
The added stigma and trauma imposed on hiv/aids-infected people, and on
a child’s life is a price our highly moralistic political leaders
will pay, when they find themselves preaching Victorian principles, old-fashioned
perceptions on sexuality and diseases to a vanished generation.
The
writer is a Human Rights Law Researcher
|
Aug
13 , 2005
|
| |
|
|
|