|
By: Mahmood
Farooqui
October 25, 2002
The best thing about the recently demised Tehelka.com was the elan,
the ‘tehelka’ with which it did whatever it did. But then, and therefore,
it left its critics with nothing to say. Even sympathetic critics
can be easily antagonised, as that great master Swift well knew,
if their carping is not well heeded.
The website folded up this week, but it will re-emerge in a more
traditional, that is, print format - which
in India still enjoys greater credibility than television, and for
good reason. The official response of the editors, and mark the
punch, “we are down but not out. We will be back soon.”
The Urdu/Hindi usage of the word ‘tehelka’ subsumes the various
meanings of the original Persian, namely, destruction, perdition,
consternation, and agony. “My friends, had I not stopped the flow
of my tears, this torrent would have brought tehelka upon the world,”
says Mir. Yet, as is the case with most Indo-Aryan languages, Urdu
brings a new emphasis to bear on the phonetic appeal of the word
tehelka, and thereby greatly enriches it. Tehelka thus becomes dhoom,
dhamaka, qayamat, shor and much else.
From its inception, till March last year, Tehelka.com had created
great waves purely as a high quality journal, even if it was a website.
The ‘Who’s Who’ of Indian writers in English and a wide variety
of budding stylists adorned its pages. Little short of a tehelka
(hereafter T) that was too. Then came the T of match-fixing scandals
and then the big bang of the defence scam. That began its descent
into perdition.
In that descent, as its editor and co-founder Tarun Tejpal informs
me, the team comprising all of five unsalaried employees (down from
115 in March last year), has attained the enlightenment which Urdu
poets claim can only come from a sincere tapish-e-dil.
“Who would have shown me the path to Madina
Had suffering (tapish-e-dil) not become my guide”
In part Tarun leaves others with little to say, as I have learnt
from my distant gaze, and a solitary meeting, because he is a great
Rhetorician, one of the finest in the country. Eighteenth-century
English masters (Swift, Pope and so on - the metaphysical and therefore
Urdu poets, in a manner of speaking) well knew that Rhetoric, which
always preempts and thus co-opts criticism, is a necessary device
for poets and writers. They learnt that from the Greeks, via the
Arabs. In Europe that process is called the Renaissance, though
it was perhaps not a renaissance but natality, nay Nativity itself.
For Christianity played no mean part in that appropriation and monopolisation
of a heritage that was not only theirs.
I will leave you to potter and ponder over that, over pot if necessary
and return to Tarun Tejpal and his antics. He says now that the
goodwill his work generated has forced him to grow so much that
he now understands Kafka more fully, two decades after reading his
entire oeuvre.
He says, “all power is malign, especially political power. Give
a man power over another, and the beast goes berserk. It is not
the fault of our instruction - our books are full of pious homilies.
It is in the very nature of the beast.” The violence of that power
is our story too, so succinctly put forth in the Bible, which begins
with God’s violence against Adam - that is the creation of Eve from
his ribs.
I will trade one year of malign and unprecedented government prosecution
for a truer understanding of Kafka, as has Tarun, happily. Hear
him: “We laugh at the witch-hunt. Those who would scare us, with
their menacing faces, look funny and harmless.”
The critics of T carp either because they distrust its sincerity,
or because they disagree with their means. Yet, when our mainstream
newspapers are being tabloidised after the west, where hidden cameras
- that labyrinth of market - and media ate up the Golden Princess
(Diana) forever, a debate on media ethics is irrelevant. You trust
them, or you don’t.
The media is the biggest industry in the world, and as a TV journalist
friend says, the AOL-Warner merger, the greatest corporate one ever,
raises questions that we the media, are yet to apprehend, let alone
tackle.
In fact the whole means and ends conundrum, and hankering after
facts, is redundant when Sun TV and Jaya TV have their preferred
versions of it. Ultimately even truth, when probed harder, is merely
a question of preferences amid plenty of options.
Indira Gandhi declared a general Emergency and openly put editors
in jail. This government is more clever and therefore more Goebbelsian
and evil. It does not put editors in jail. It unleashes the full
force and might of the State on the small fry, that is the likes
of Shivani Bhatnagar and Tehelka.com, beginning with the local SHO
and upwards to the IB, ED, Income Tax, CID and thence to Jaya and
Arun Jaitley and George Fernandes. And that, as a senior editor
of a leading national magazine confided to me, has scared the shit
off the mainstream press.
Gujarat was really the turning point, as the BJP would soon realise.
The real battle lines are being
drawn there, and in Kashmir and in Gujarat. I will leave you to
your preparation.
|